A curated knowledge hub for technical perspectives, company articles, LinkedIn thought leadership, industry references, podcasts and interviews.
Why oil and gas teams can own enormous amounts of subsurface data and still struggle to answer the most important question: where should we drill next?
Having the data is not the same as having a development plan. The evidence has to be assembled, reconciled and made useful for technical review.
Rock, logs, petrophysics, source truth, analog quality and the evidence foundation behind defensible subsurface decisions.
Well identity, provenance and source consistency determine whether downstream subsurface analytics can actually be trusted.
Read the insight →Lateral length, time on production, operating history and development context can make raw production comparisons misleading.
Read the insight →Reservoir quality, vertical position, nearby performance, spacing, completions and uncertainty all belong in the landing decision.
Read the insight →Where automation adds leverage, where uncertainty must remain visible, and why technical authority stays with engineers and geoscientists.
Connecting geological, petrophysical, production, completion, geospatial, rights and economic evidence without obscuring provenance.
Explore ASI™ →A future piece on HOLD, UNKNOWN, conflicting evidence and why a model should not force an answer when the science does not support one.
PlannedHow ranking and exclusion can protect capital when the evidence is weaker than the development story.
PlannedNext-best well ranking, spacing, analogs, forecasting, interference, landing position and the evidence required before capital is committed.
Why rock quality, production, landing position, spacing, completions, analogs and uncertainty belong in one ranking problem.
Read the insight →Spacing, depletion, timing and nearby development can materially change how an offset should be interpreted.
Read the insight →Decline behavior, analog quality, operating history and assumptions should remain visible when future production and value are forecast.
Read the insight →Nearby laterals, azimuth, depletion and development sequence can materially change how an otherwise attractive location should be ranked.
Read the insight →A fast technical read around offsets, analogs, production, completions and uncertainty before an election deadline.
Read the insight →Turning inherited data, compressed diligence windows and mature-field evidence into a more focused technical and capital-allocation picture.
Owning the evidence is not the same as having a defensible next-well decision.
Read on PINN AI →Also on LinkedIn ↗How subsurface, production, completions, land, rights and economics can narrow a broad opportunity universe.
Read the insight →How older logs, production histories and completion evidence can expose remaining opportunity without assuming every anomaly is pay.
Read the insight →Mature assets can contain remaining drilling and redevelopment potential visible only when history, geology, geometry and rights are evaluated together.
Read the insight →Lease, tract, unit, pooling, depth rights, spacing and geometry determine whether subsurface upside becomes executable inventory.
Read the insight →When the deadline will not move, focus first on the technical uncertainties capable of changing the investment decision.
Read the insight →Founder conversations and industry interviews about PINN AI, subsurface decision-making and building practical AI for oil and gas.
A founder conversation about PINN AI, oil and gas decision-making, and practical AI for technical and capital-allocation workflows.
Watch on YouTube →Recently recorded. This becomes a live media card when the publisher releases the episode.
Episode forthcomingFuture appearances can live here with a thumbnail, source, date, short context and direct outbound link.
Expandable